Chapter 22 Module 6

2. What was distinctive about the end of Europe’s African and Asian empires compared to other cases of imperial disintegration?

After the preparation of the majority around Nationalism, Europe's African and Asian empires soon came to an end. Because of this, they decided to create an excessive amount of nation-states. This was new because it was the first time an empire had been so firmly connected with the activation of whole social orders around a patriot belief system. Nor had before instances of magnificent decrease created such a significant number of new country expresses, each asserting an equivalent spot in a universe of country states. All new country states asserted an equivalent spot in a world of nation-states. Unmistakable things that carried African and Asian realms to an end were the ascent of different states and World War I and II.

3. What international circumstances and social changes contributed to the end of colonial empires?

Europe started to lose the capacity of its different superpowers. These empires incorporated the rising superpower of the US and the Soviet Union. They saw the colonial empires as ancient and wanted to be able to have the power to become superior. By the mid-twentieth century in Asia and the mid-twentieth century in Africa, a second or third era of Western-instructed men had emerged all through the provincial world. The men were mindful of the distinctions in qualities and practices in the European cultures, contrasted with different pieces of the world. Soon after, individuals started to acknowledge changes were coming, and that they were going to evolve. 

7. What conflicts and differences divided India’s nationalist movement?

There was a conflict that divided India's nationalist movement because they didn’t know whether or not to participate in British-sponsored legislative bodies without complete independence. While some activist Hindus advocated the hatred of Muslim, others sought to improve the way women were treated, as a distraction from the chief task gaining their independence from Britain. Gandhi’s chief lieutenant, Jawaharlal Nehru, supported it industrialization but Gandhi did not agree with his views.  Not all nationalists accepted Gandhi's nonviolence because they wanted to fight to stand up from themselves.